Nostalgia City Mysteries

Mark S. Bacon

Unknown's avatar

About mbaconauthor

Mystery writer and journalist; former newspaper police reporter.

Follow Woolrich down this alley

0
The Black Path of Fear
by Cornell Woolrich
Ballantine Books  1982
160 pages
Price varies (available used only)

Bill Scott is honest, though obviously not the brightest guy in the world.  But he can’t help himself.  He’s in love.  Unfortunately Eve Roman, his new love, is married to a Miami mob boss.  But she loves Scott, too, so they runaway together—to Havana.

In the first few pages of Cornell Woolrich’s The Black Path of Fear, Eve is stabbed to death in a Cuban nightclub and the police blame Scott.  We get the backstory of how Scott and Mrs. Roman got together in a long flashback, but the majority of  the book—which hour-by-hour covers no more than a day and a half—describes Scott’s desperate attempts to find the murderer and clear himself.  His chances look dim.  He doesn’t speak Spanish, the police are combing the city for him, he knows no one in Havana and when it comes down to it, a big part of him doesn’t really care.  Eve is dead.

I’m working my way through Woolrich novels and short stories.  It’s a rewarding journey although Black Path is not his best.  My 1982 printing of the book (it was first published in 1944) reads almost as if it lacks a final edit.   The dialog occasionally sounds a bit off, Scott’s hat mysteriously appears in one scene—after he’d dropped it somewhere else—and he doesn’t use his love for the dead woman as an argument for his innocence.

That’s the bad news.  The good news is Woolrich takes a certainly unoriginal plot (though undoubtedly copied many times since) and builds it into a succession of nail-biting scenes in some of the most Black Path of Fearmemorably ugly, foreboding settings you can imagine.   In one scene Scott is escorted by police down a suffocatingly narrow  alley—too small to accommodate a car—in a run-down portion of Havana’s Chinatown.  The alley smelled “like asafetida and somebody burning feathers, and the lee side of a sewer.”  It was also dim.

It wasn’t of an even darkness; it was mottled darkness.  Every few yards or so an oil lamp or kerosene torch or a Chinese paper lantern, back within some doorway or some stall opening, would squirt out a puddle of light to relieve the gloom.  They were different colors, these smears, depending on the reflector they filtered through: orange and sulphur-green, and once even a sort of purple-red, were spewed around on the dirty walls like grape juice.

In another scene Scott is feeling his way in pitch darkness across a silent and seemingly empty skid-row office when something pricks his ear.  It’s a clever, suspenseful set-up that leads to a creative result.

Scott is similar to many Woolrich protagonists, an ordinary guy dumped into extraordinary circumstances and challenged to save someone else, himself, his sanity, or all three.  Emotions, not only of fear, but loneliness, disgust and hopelessness often drive his plots.

She had the look on her face of someone who has just been granted a quick glimpse down into the bottommost depths of hell from the top of the stairs.  And didn’t turn away quickly enough.

Woolrich was a noir master.  Although he’s not as well known as Raymond Chandler or Dashiell Hammett, according to his biographer Woolrich influenced not only the French Roman noir novels but the bleak Hollywood crime dramas, film noir.

To me, noir represents not only a grim, dark setting or plot, but a style of writing. And Woolrich’s style is unmistakable: “Silence fell, and we kicked it around between us for a while.”

Like the majority of Woolrich’s novels and short stories, Black Path was dramatized, in this case, many times: One of several radio versions starred Cary Grant (1946), the movie version (1946) starred Robert Cummings and Peter Lorre and a TV drama (1954) had James Arness as Scott.

Black Path was one of Woolrich’s “black” series in the 1940s, when the author was in his prime, cranking out so many thrilling novels that he released some under two pen names, William Irish and George Hopley.  Biographer Francis Nevins, Jr. called Woolrich the Poe of the Twentieth Century.  Black Path is an entertaining, compelling read, but stick with Woolrich titles for the whole dark ride through the 1940s.

Today’s flash fiction mystery

3

With apologies to Lawrence Block for taking the title of his crime series, here is today’s flash fiction mystery–at exactly 100 words.

Hit Man

“This lawyer my wife used to know–name’s Murphy–said you might be able to help.  I really don’t want to, but I’ve got no choice. My wife says she hates me for what I did. Won’t forgive me. Says she’ll kill me. But she won’t give me a damn divorce. I dunno why I’m telling you this. See, this is my only way out. So, can you do a contract or tell me who can?”

“What’d you say the name was?”

“Hemings, Julia Hemings.”

“I mean your name.”

“George Hemings, why?”

“Oh, I have a contract. Thanks for coming.”

Read this! I have awesome content

5

If you’re looking for quality content, you’ve come to the right place.  I mean, don’t we all want good content?  I like it in hamburger: low fat content and none of that pink slime that was in the news recently.  Some people like adult content in their movies.  Whipped cream lovers like contents under pressure, otherwise the stuff would just stay in the can.   Without a table of contents it’d be difficult to find something in a book, and if you have an alcoholic content higher than .08 you’d better not be behind the wheel.

But perhaps you’re looking for a different type of content.  It’s hard to tell because content, or awesome content, seems to be all it takes to satisfy even the most discriminating online reader today.  This must be true because I’ve read it dozens of times on the Internet.  Looking for advice on how to make more “friends” or get retweeted more often?  Quality content is the answer from every media guru or how-to website.  Do you know what you need to get more readers for your blog or to spiff up your email?  You guessed it: quality content.

Content, as it’s used (overused) on the Web and in most forms of business communication, is more than just a horrifying cliché.  Could you call it a euphemism for bright, witty, original, informative and clear writing?  Possibly, but my sense is that in many instances the word is used without much forethought. The term borders on gibberish, piffle, nonsense.  Here’s a good example:

Bloggers get lots of spam in the “comments” sections of their sites.  God only knows the purpose of these, except to lure you into clicking on a website—a decision you will regret long after you have your hard drive reformatted.  What many of these spammers begin with is praise for the site, using the phrase quality content.  No thinking involved here.  Blanket quality content could refer to a blog about taxidermy, Cartesian philosophy or football.

Inane use of the word, however, is not limited to spammers.  Enter two words into a search engine and you’ll be Awesome content reallyovercome with thousands of websites offering advice on creating awesome content.  Often the advice is bland, generic and silly.  Case in point: The website sitepoint.com offers an article cleverly entitled “How to Generate Awesome Content.”  You need an attention-grabbing headline, accurate information and rich media, we’re told.

“Originality is a key ingredient…” the website says, but “…the ideas themselves don’t have to be wholly original.”  In addition to this site, and thousands more like it, are web pages that tell where to find awesome content that you can simply appropriate.  Other sites offer formatted 140-character content you can easily copy and paste into your tweets.

What I’m getting at here is that not only do I object to the term “content,” the necessity of providing stock material and short-cuts is a sad reflection on education or perhaps on our creative powers.  Certainly websites that provide summaries and indices of material available elsewhere can be useful—I do it myself.  But the notion of just cutting and pasting simply to have something to say is pitiful.

So, if you’re looking for awesome content (we’ll leave the task of dealing with those who misuse the word awesome for later), check out my archives, read Dashiell Hammett, Dickens or pick up a copy of the New York Times.

Next time we’ll get back to talking about books, mysteries and mystery writers.  I read an article once, however, that advised me to keep my blog lively by occasionally posting off topic.  It also advised an occasional rant, but I would never do that.